Barley glycemic index glycemic load, carbohydrates
glycemic
index: 35 average
glycemic
load:14
Average glycemic index and glycemic load values of Barley are based on 11 tests made in years 1985 - 2006.
See table below to find out more about glycemic index tests. Click details button to expand more informations.
Check also Barley calories information.
Barley glycemic index tests
| Country | Glycemic load | Glycemic index | Test year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 16 | Glycemic index: 37 | Test year: 2006 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Granfeldt Y, Wu X, Björk I. Determination of glycaemic index; some methodological aspects related to the analysis of carbohydrate load and characteristics of the previous evening meal. Euro J Clin Nutr 2006; 60: 104-12.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 15 | Glycemic index: 35 | Test year: 2003 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Wolever TMS, Vorster HH, Björk I, Brand-Miller J, Brighenti F, Mann JI, Ramdath DD, Granfeldt Y, Holt S, Perry TL, Venter C, Wu X. Determination of the glycaemic index of foods: Interlaboratory study. Euro J Clin Nutr 2003; 57: 475-82.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 11 | Glycemic index: 25 | Test year: 1995 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Sydney University’s Glycemic Index Research Service (Human Nutrition Unit, University of Sydney, Australia), unpublished observations, 1995-2007.
|
||||
| Country: Australia | Glycemic load: 25 | Glycemic index: 66 | Test year: 1992 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Brand-Miller J, Pang E, Bramall L. Rice: a high or low glycemic index food ? Am J Clin Nutr 1992; 56: 1034-6.
|
||||
| Country: UK | Glycemic load: 15 | Glycemic index: 35 | Test year: 2005 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Henry CJK, Lightowler HJ, Strik CM, Renton H, Hails S. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commercially available products in the UK. Br J Nutr 2005; 94: 922-30.
|
||||
| Country: Tunisia | Glycemic load: 21 | Glycemic index: 50 | Test year: 1994 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Wolever TMS, Katzman-Relle L, Jenkins AL, Vuksan V, Josse RG, Jenkins DJA. Glycaemic index of 102 complex carbohydrate foods in patients with diabetes. Nutr Res 1994; 14(5): 651-69.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 12 | Glycemic index: 29 | Test year: 1987 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Josse RG, Wong GS, Lee R. The glycemic index: similarity of values derived in insulin-dependent and non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. J Am Coll Nutr 1987; 6: 295-305.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 11 | Glycemic index: 27 | Test year: 1988 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Jenkins DJA, Wesson V, Wolever TMS, Jenkins AL, Kalmusky J, Guidici S, Csima A, Josse RG, Wong GS. Wholemeal versus wholegrain breads: proportion of whole or cracked grains and the glycaemic response. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988; 297: 958-60.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 9 | Glycemic index: 22 | Test year: 1985 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Jenkins DJA, Wolever TMS, Kalmusky J, Giudici S, Giordano C, Wong GS, Bird JN, Pattern R, Hall M, Buckley G, Little JA. Low glycemic index carbohydrate foods in the management of hyperlipidemia. Am J Clin Nutr 1985; 42(4): 604-17.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 9 | Glycemic index: 22 | Test year: 1987 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Wolever TMS, Jenkins DJA, Josse RG, Wong GS, Lee R. The glycemic index: similarity of values derived in insulin-dependent and non-insulin dependent diabetic patients. J Am Coll Nutr 1987; 6: 295-305.
|
||||
| Country: UK | Glycemic load: 15 | Glycemic index: 35 | Test year: 2005 | details |
Barley glycemic index test detailsTest source: Henry CJK, Lightowler HJ, Strik CM, Renton H, Hails S. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commercially available products in the UK. Br J Nutr 2005; 94: 922-30.
|
||||