Pita bread glycemic index glycemic load, carbohydrates
glycemic
index: 63 average
glycemic
load:10
Average glycemic index and glycemic load values of Pita bread are based on 5 tests made in years 1994 - 2008.
See table below to find out more about glycemic index tests. Click details button to expand more informations.
Check also Pita bread calories information.
Pita bread glycemic index tests
| Country | Glycemic load | Glycemic index | Test year | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country: UK | Glycemic load: 10 | Glycemic index: 68 | Test year: 2005 | details |
Pita bread glycemic index test detailsTest source: Henry CJK, Lightowler HJ, Strik CM, Renton H, Hails S. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commercially available products in the UK. Br J Nutr 2005; 94: 922-30.
|
||||
| Country: UK | Glycemic load: 8 | Glycemic index: 56 | Test year: 2005 | details |
Pita bread glycemic index test detailsTest source: Henry CJK, Lightowler HJ, Strik CM, Renton H, Hails S. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commercially available products in the UK. Br J Nutr 2005; 94: 922-30.
|
||||
| Country: Canada | Glycemic load: 10 | Glycemic index: 57 | Test year: 1994 | details |
Pita bread glycemic index test detailsTest source: Wolever TMS, Katzman-Relle L, Jenkins AL, Vuksan V, Josse RG, Jenkins DJA. Glycaemic index of 102 complex carbohydrate foods in patients with diabetes. Nutr Res 1994; 14(5): 651-69.
|
||||
| Country: UK | Glycemic load: 10 | Glycemic index: 67 | Test year: 2008 | details |
Pita bread glycemic index test detailsTest source: Aston LM, Gambell JM, Lee DM, Bryant SP, Jebb SA. Determination of the glycaemic index of various staple carbohydrate-rich foods in the UK diet. Euro J Clin Nutr 2008, 62(2): 279-285.
|
||||
| Country: UK | Glycemic load: 10 | Glycemic index: 69 | Test year: 2005 | details |
Pita bread glycemic index test detailsTest source: Henry CJK, Lightowler HJ, Strik CM, Renton H, Hails S. Glycaemic index and glycaemic load values of commercially available products in the UK. Br J Nutr 2005; 94: 922-30.
|
||||